Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Bright Line Test is not a legally sanctioned method for transfer pricing adjustments relating to advertising, marketing and promotion expenses. Following the established position in Sony Ericsson and Maruti Suzuki, the High Court rejected the Department's use of that test for the impugned adjustment. The pendency of challenges to those precedents before the Supreme Court did not justify a different approach, although any contrary law subsequently declared in those proceedings would apply correspondingly.
Bright Line Test is not a legally sanctioned method for transfer pricing adjustments relating to advertising, marketing and promotion expenses. Following the established position in Sony Ericsson and Maruti Suzuki, the High Court rejected the Department's use of that test for the impugned adjustment. The pendency of challenges to those precedents before the Supreme Court did not justify a different approach, although any contrary law subsequently declared in those proceedings would apply correspondingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
