Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Bright Line Test is not a legally sanctioned method for transfer pricing adjustments relating to advertising, marketing and promotion expenses. Following the established position in Sony Ericsson and Maruti Suzuki, the High Court rejected the Department's use of that test for the impugned adjustment. The pendency of challenges to those precedents before the Supreme Court did not justify a different approach, although any contrary law subsequently declared in those proceedings would apply correspondingly.
Bright Line Test is not a legally sanctioned method for transfer pricing adjustments relating to advertising, marketing and promotion expenses. Following the established position in Sony Ericsson and Maruti Suzuki, the High Court rejected the Department's use of that test for the impugned adjustment. The pendency of challenges to those precedents before the Supreme Court did not justify a different approach, although any contrary law subsequently declared in those proceedings would apply correspondingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.