Credit-note turnover adjustments preserve inverted-duty refunds, while ministerial re-computation does not constitute an impermissible appellate reman...
Revisional jurisdiction over export quota premium deductions requires both error and Revenue prejudice; a permissible assessment view cannot be displa...
Permissive possession granted to a developer under a joint development agreement, solely for development and construction while ownership remains with the co-owners, does not constitute possession in part performance under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. Accordingly, section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act is not attracted, and the agreement does not effect a transfer of the capital asset in the relevant previous year. The text notes that where the developer holds possession only as the owners' representative, no capital gains arise merely upon execution of the agreement.
Permissive possession granted to a developer under a joint development agreement, solely for development and construction while ownership remains with the co-owners, does not constitute possession in part performance under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. Accordingly, section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act is not attracted, and the agreement does not effect a transfer of the capital asset in the relevant previous year. The text notes that where the developer holds possession only as the owners' representative, no capital gains arise merely upon execution of the agreement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
