https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102079 Permissive possession granted to a developer under a joint development agreement, solely for development and construction while ownership remains with the co-owners, does not constitute possession in part performance under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. Accordingly, section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act is not attracted, and the agreement does not effect a transfer of the capital asset in the relevant previous year. The text notes that where the developer holds possession only as the owners' representative, no capital gains arise merely upon execution of the agreement. en-us Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:54:57 +0530 Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:54:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102079 Permissive possession granted to a developer under a joint development agreement, solely for development and construction while ownership remains with the co-owners, does not constitute possession in part performance under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. Accordingly, section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act is not attracted, and the agreement does not effect a transfer of the capital asset in the relevant previous year. The text notes that where the developer holds possession only as the owners' representative, no capital gains arise merely upon execution of the agreement. Highlights Income Tax Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:54:57 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102079