Captive power transfers are benchmarked using the tariff charged...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Method
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Captive power transfers are benchmarked using the tariff charged by State Electricity Boards to industrial consumers, rather than rates charged by generating companies to distribution entities; the consumer tariff reflects market value and arm's length price under the applicable provisions. Transfers of steam by eligible units may qualify for deduction where supported by consistent prior treatment. Common expenses may be allocated to eligible units only where they directly relate to those units, with specified expenses allocated on a manpower basis rather than turnover, requiring recomputation. For effluent treatment plants, an authentic third-party quotation may be used under the Other Method without requiring multiple quotations; the related adjustment is therefore not sustainable. The appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.