Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeals and the stay order against the co-noticees survived after the main noticee obtained settlement under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998.
Analysis: The settlement of the demand in favour of the main declarant under Section 90(1) of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 brought the adjudication proceedings to an end. Once the principal liability stood settled fully and finally, the proceedings against the co-noticees, including the penalties imposed on them, could not survive independently. In that situation, the stay order already passed in the appeals also ceased to have any effect.
Conclusion: The appeals by the co-noticees did not survive, the stay order was recalled, and the appeals were dismissed.