Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the settlement accepted under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme in favour of the principal noticee extended to the co-noticees so as to bring the pending appeals against them to an end.
Analysis: The appeals arose from a common show cause notice issued to the principal noticee and the co-noticees for duty and penalties. The principal company had filed a declaration under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, and that declaration had been accepted. The Board's Circular clarified that where a common matter is settled under the Scheme, no civil proceedings for fine or penalty should continue against co-noticees, and the settlement is deemed full and final in respect of the other persons on whom notices were issued on the same matter. The Tribunal also proceeded in the light of its earlier decisions applying the same principle.
Conclusion: The benefit of the settlement under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme was held to extend to the co-noticees, and the contention of the appellants was accepted.
Final Conclusion: The connected appeals were brought to an end in accordance with the Board's Circular and the Tribunal's earlier view on the effect of a common settlement under the Scheme.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a common show cause notice is settled under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme in favour of the principal noticee, the resulting settlement operates as full and final resolution for co-noticees as well, preventing continuation of civil penalty proceedings on the same matter.