Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in view of the settlement accepted under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme and the binding order of the jurisdictional High Court, the penalty proceedings against the co-noticee appellant could continue.
Analysis: The jurisdictional High Court had recorded that, once the main noticee's declaration under the scheme was accepted, the proceedings against the co-noticee would abate and the settlement would be full and final in respect of other persons proceeded against on the same matter. The Tribunal held that the order of the jurisdictional High Court was binding on it within its territorial jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The penalty proceedings against the appellant could not survive, and the appeal was allowed.