Pre-deposit waiver in penalty dispute granted on prima facie case and remand for merits without deposit condition.

Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted because the appellants showed a strong prima facie case based on a Board circular and an earlier Tribunal ruling that penalty may not be exigible on a co-noticee where the main assessee's case is settled under the KVS scheme. The challenged order had rejected the circular but did not deal with the Tribunal precedent relied on by the appellants. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the appeal on merits without insisting on pre-deposit and after considering all grounds.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery, and whether the matter should be remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for decision on merits without insisting on pre-deposit.

Analysis: The appellants showed a strong prima facie case based on the Board's Circular and the Tribunal's earlier ruling that, where the main assessee's case is settled under the KVS scheme, penalty may not be exigible on the co-noticee. The order under challenge had declined to accept the circular but did not return any finding on the Tribunal precedent relied upon by the appellants. In these circumstances, insistence on pre-deposit was not warranted and the appeal had to be heard on merits.

Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted, and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the appeal on merits without insisting on pre-deposit and after considering all grounds, including the Board's Circular and the cited Tribunal ruling.

---