Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deduction of tax from the petitioner's 2nd and 3rd running bills was to be governed by the earlier VAT regime or by the Goods and Services Tax regime, and whether the writ petition survived in view of the earlier binding decision on the same question.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the stage at which the transaction was to be treated as taxable for purposes of deduction from running bills. The Court noted that the same issue had already been settled in an earlier decision, where the applicable regime was linked to whether bills and invoices were raised before or after the commencement of the GST regime, and the clarification in the departmental circular had been found consistent with the statutory scheme. In light of that binding determination, the Court found no infirmity in the respondents applying GST deductions to the petitioner's later bills. The request to make a representation for any relief under the Sale of Goods Act was left open and was not adjudicated.
Conclusion: The deduction from the 2nd and 3rd running bills under the GST regime was upheld and the writ petition failed as infructuous.