https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763983 The HC ruled that deductions made from the petitioner's 2nd and 3rd running bills under the CGST and SGST Acts were justified, as the bills were submitted after the GST regime commenced. The court upheld the precedent set in WP(C) No.4201/2020, confirming that the GST Acts apply to contracts executed post-GST implementation. Consequently, the petition was deemed infructuous. However, the court permitted the petitioner to seek relief under Section 64A of the Sales of Goods Act, 1930 through a separate representation. en-us Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Jan 2025 08:33:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763983 The HC ruled that deductions made from the petitioner's 2nd and 3rd running bills under the CGST and SGST Acts were justified, as the bills were submitted after the GST regime commenced. The court upheld the precedent set in WP(C) No.4201/2020, confirming that the GST Acts apply to contracts executed post-GST implementation. Consequently, the petition was deemed infructuous. However, the court permitted the petitioner to seek relief under Section 64A of the Sales of Goods Act, 1930 through a separate representation. Case-Laws GST Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763983