Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2024 (6) TMI 110 - HC - GST

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Time of supply governs GST liability in transition works contracts; reimbursement depends on contract terms and tax-adjustment rules. In works contracts straddling the VAT-GST transition, GST liability was applied by reference to the time of supply: where invoices were raised and payment ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Time of supply governs GST liability in transition works contracts; reimbursement depends on contract terms and tax-adjustment rules.

                          In works contracts straddling the VAT-GST transition, GST liability was applied by reference to the time of supply: where invoices were raised and payment was made or became due on or after 01.07.2017, the post-GST regime governed and the circular was upheld. The court treated works contracts as composite supplies of services under GST and rejected interference merely because the result was harsh for some contractors. Claims for reimbursement or upward revision of contract value depended on the contract terms and the tax-adjustment rule under Section 64A of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930; because the contract materials were incomplete, no immediate entitlement was declared and the matter was left for administrative consideration.




                          Issues: (i) Whether the impugned GST circular correctly applied GST liability and deduction of tax to invoices and payments arising on or after 01.07.2017 in works contracts executed across the VAT-GST transition. (ii) Whether contractors were entitled, on account of the GST regime, to reimbursement or upward revision of the contract value by the additional tax component.

                          Issue (i): Whether the impugned GST circular correctly applied GST liability and deduction of tax to invoices and payments arising on or after 01.07.2017 in works contracts executed across the VAT-GST transition.

                          Analysis: The applicable liability was determined with reference to the statutory concept of time of supply. Under the GST framework, tax on goods or services becomes payable when the supply occurs in the manner prescribed by the charging provisions, and the relevant time is tied to the date of invoice or receipt of payment, depending on which event occurs earlier. Works contract was treated as a composite supply of services under the GST scheme. On that basis, if invoices were raised on or after 01.07.2017 and payment was received or receivable on or after that date, GST liability attached under the new regime. The circular therefore aligned with the statutory scheme and did not warrant interference merely because it operated harshly on some contractors.

                          Conclusion: The circular was upheld, and GST was held payable on post-01.07.2017 invoices and corresponding payments.

                          Issue (ii): Whether contractors were entitled, on account of the GST regime, to reimbursement or upward revision of the contract value by the additional tax component.

                          Analysis: The claim for reimbursement depended on the contractual terms and on whether the price was fixed without scope for adjustment. The governing principle from Section 64A of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 allows tax adjustment only when there is no contract to the contrary and the tax change occurs after the contract. The Court also noted that the statutory tax burden and the contractual allocation of that burden are distinct, and that anti-profiteering principles and possible input tax credit considerations may affect the final entitlement. As the contract documents were incomplete, the Court found the materials insufficient to decide whether the petitioners satisfied the conditions for reimbursement. It therefore left the petitioners to approach the awarding authorities with representations and directed consideration of the claim on the available materials.

                          Conclusion: No immediate judicial declaration of entitlement to reimbursement or revised contract value was granted; the claim was left for administrative consideration.

                          Final Conclusion: The challenge to GST deduction failed, while the request for tax reimbursement was not decided on merits and was relegated to the contractual authorities for consideration.

                          Ratio Decidendi: In works contracts straddling the VAT-GST transition, tax liability follows the statutory time of supply and applies to invoices and payments arising after the commencement of GST, while any claim for passing on increased tax burden depends on the contract terms and the conditions governing tax adjustment.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found