TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Anticipatory Bail Granted: Appeal Allowed, Non-Arrest During Investigation Considered; Subject to Trial Court Conditions.</h1> <h3>PIYUSH PAUL SINGH Versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT</h3> PIYUSH PAUL SINGH Versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT - TMI Issues:Grant of anticipatory bail based on non-arrest during investigation and filing of complaint.Analysis:The Supreme Court, comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar, granted anticipatory bail to the appellant. The appellant had not been arrested during the investigation, and a complaint had been filed. The Court noted this fact and set aside the impugned order. Consequently, the appellant was granted anticipatory bail subject to terms and conditions to be determined by the trial court. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was overturned based on the specific circumstances of the case.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
