Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to a person accused of offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 in the face of the statutory restrictions under Section 45 and the allegations of possession and diversion of proceeds of crime.
Analysis: The application was considered in the context of allegations that the applicant had substantial deposits and fixed deposits disproportionate to known sources of income and that such assets could be linked to proceeds of crime generated through the underlying laundering activity. The statutory bar under Section 45 was treated as applicable, and the case was held not to fall within the proviso for women, minors, sick or infirm persons, or where the amount involved is below the prescribed threshold. On the material noted, it was considered too early to hold that the applicant was not involved in the alleged laundering activity.
Conclusion: Anticipatory bail was not granted, and the application was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: In a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, anticipatory bail can be refused where the statutory conditions under Section 45 apply and the record discloses a prima facie link between the accused and proceeds of crime exceeding the statutory threshold.