Anticipatory Bail Granted: Appeal Allowed, Non-Arrest During Investigation Considered; Subject to Trial Court Conditions.Grant of anticipatory bail - appellant not arrested during the investigation - HELD THAT:- Admittedly, the appellant has not been arrested during the investigation and as of now a complaint has been filed. The impugned order is set aside and the appellant is granted anticipatory bail on terms and conditions to the satisfaction of the trial court - Appeal allowed.... ... ... Issues:
Grant of anticipatory bail based on non-arrest during investigation and filing of complaint.

Analysis:
The Supreme Court, comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar, granted anticipatory bail to the appellant. The appellant had not been arrested during the investigation, and a complaint had been filed. The Court noted this fact and set aside the impugned order. Consequently, the appellant was granted anticipatory bail subject to terms and conditions to be determined by the trial court. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was overturned based on the specific circumstances of the case. Grant of anticipatory bail - appellant not arrested during the investigation - HELD THAT:- Admittedly, the appellant has not been arrested during the investigation and as of now a complaint has been filed. The impugned order is set aside and the appellant is granted anticipatory bail on terms and conditions to the satisfaction of the trial court - Appeal allowed. PIYUSH PAUL SINGH Versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
Money Laundering
2024 (7) TMI 623 - SC Order - TMI
SUPREME COURT - SC
Dated:- 9-7-2024
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2835/2024 [@ SLP [CRL. ] NO. 1594/2024] - -
PMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH And HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Siddhartha Dave, Sr. Adv. Ms. Megha Mukerjee, Adv. Mr. Akshay Girish Ringe, AOR Mr. Dhananjay Gupta, Adv For the Respondent : Mr. Suryaprakash V Raju, A.S.G. Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv. Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Adv. Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Adv. Mr. T S Sabarish, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma Aor, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR ORDER Leave granted. Admittedly, the appellant has not been arrested during the investigation and as of now a complaint has been filed. In such view of the matter, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appellant is granted anticipatory bail on terms and conditions to the satisfaction of the trial court. The appeal stands allowed accordingly.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, Orders

Contact Us At :

FAQs :

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

2024 (7) TMI 623