Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the managing agency business constituted property so that the income derived from it could fall within section 4(3)(i) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 as income from property held under trust for charitable purposes.
Analysis: The managing agency was held to be business, and business was treated as property of wide import unless the statutory context restricted that meaning. The Court held that section 4(3)(i), standing by itself, was wide enough to include business within "property", and that a trust could exist over such business even though it involved the performance of services and was terminable at notice. The fact that the trust fund was used only as security did not prevent the managing agency from being treated as property held under trust, because the trust deed and the agency agreement formed part of an integrated scheme.
Conclusion: The managing agency business was property, and on the language of section 4(3)(i) it could be regarded as property held under trust; this issue was answered in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: The term "property" in section 4(3)(i) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 is wide enough to include business, so income from a business carried on by trustees can, in principle, be treated as income from property held under trust.