Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sum of Rs. 3,50,000 received for relinquishing the managing agency was a capital receipt or a revenue receipt assessable to tax.
Analysis: The assessee's main business was the carrying on and dealing in managing agencies, as shown by its memorandum, its existing multiple managing agencies, and the wide powers under the managed company's articles. The impugned payment arose out of a composite commercial arrangement under which the assessee voluntarily resigned one managing agency while also selling its shareholding and securing repayment of loans. The managing agency was not a destroyed or sterilised capital asset in the hands of the assessee, but part of its ordinary trading operations. The agreement for managing agency itself permitted resignation, and the facts showed no compulsory cessation or material impairment of the assessee's business structure. On the principles distinguishing a capital asset from a trading asset, compensation received in the ordinary course of a business of acquiring and dealing in managing agencies is a trading receipt.
Conclusion: The receipt of Rs. 3,50,000 was a revenue receipt and was assessable to tax.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee's business itself consists in acquiring, holding, varying, and disposing of managing agencies, a payment received on the voluntary relinquishment of one such agency in the ordinary course of that business is a trading receipt and not a capital receipt.