TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the assessee-society was established for education or for advancement of any other object of general public utility not involving the carrying on of any activity for profit. (ii) Whether the insurance agency activity and the income therefrom were outside the exemption under the Act or were property held in trust for charitable purposes.
Issue (i): Whether the assessee-society was established for education or for advancement of any other object of general public utility not involving the carrying on of any activity for profit.
Analysis: The objects of the society were examined along with the earlier Tribunal orders and the High Court decision on the same constitution. The educational institutions were not run by the assessee-society itself, but by separate managing committees under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921. The Court also treated the unused hospital object as to be ignored. On the remaining objects, the trust deed showed distributive objects, and the principal purpose was not education in the sense used in charitable law. The relevant test under section 2(15) required the purpose to fall within charitable purpose, and the earlier binding view had held the assessee to be within the general public utility limb.
Conclusion: The assessee-society was not established for education, but for advancement of any other object of general public utility not involving the carrying on of any activity for profit.
Issue (ii): Whether the insurance agency activity and the income therefrom were outside the exemption under the Act or were property held in trust for charitable purposes.
Analysis: The assessee had obtained and continued an insurance agency licence and had engaged in repeated, regular and continuous insurance transactions with a profit motive, which amounted to carrying on business. However, that business was authorised by the objects clause and the income from it was required to be applied for the charitable objects specified in the trust deed. Applying the principles that business can be property held in trust and that such property may be dedicated to charitable purposes, the Court held that the insurance business itself was trust property and the income from it was wholly earmarked for charitable objects. On that footing, section 13(1)(bb) did not defeat the exemption.
Conclusion: The insurance agency business was property held in trust for charitable purposes and its income was exempt under section 11.
Final Conclusion: The assessee retained charitable status under the general public utility limb, and the insurance business income remained exempt because it was held under trust for the charitable objects of the society.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a trust's objects fall within advancement of general public utility and a business activity is authorised as trust property with its income dedicated to charitable objects, the business income remains exempt and is not denied merely because the activity yields profit.
TaxTMI 
