<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (5) TMI 7 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49658</link>
    <description>The court held that the managing agency constituted under Exhibit B must be treated as property held on trust within section 4(3)(i) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. Regarding the claim for exemption, the court remanded the case to the High Court of Bombay to determine whether the exemption should be under section 4(3)(i) or section 4(3)(ia) of the Act. The respondent was directed to pay the appellant&#039;s costs for the appeal and the hearing before the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (5) TMI 7 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49658</link>
      <description>The court held that the managing agency constituted under Exhibit B must be treated as property held on trust within section 4(3)(i) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. Regarding the claim for exemption, the court remanded the case to the High Court of Bombay to determine whether the exemption should be under section 4(3)(i) or section 4(3)(ia) of the Act. The respondent was directed to pay the appellant&#039;s costs for the appeal and the hearing before the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>