Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible despite alleged non-compliance with Rule 57F(4) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and whether the Department had failed to disprove the claimed co-relation between the duty-paid coils and the sheets on which credit was taken.
Analysis: The Tribunal had recorded that the Department attempted to show that the sheets received in the factory did not emanate from duty-paid coils, but it failed to establish that the sheets found in the assessee's premises were made out of non-duty-paid coils. The finding further recorded that the weight of the duty-paid coils tallied with the weight of the sheets and that there was a broad co-relation between them. On those findings, no substantial question of law arose.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was held admissible and the appeal was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the factual findings establish a broad co-relation between duty-paid inputs and the final goods and the Department fails to disprove that nexus, no substantial question of law arises and credit cannot be denied on a mere allegation of procedural non-compliance.