Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2006 (2) TMI 195

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Appellant. The Appellant has sought to raise the following two questions of law - 1. "Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Hon'ble CESTAT erred in holding that : (i) despite the admitted non-compliance of the prescribed procedure Rule 57F (4) by the Respondents herein, the burden to prove that such non-compliance could result in any wrongful gain to the Assesse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to show that the sheets as received in the factory did not emanate from the duty paid coils and in paragraph-11, the Tribunal has observed that the Department did not establish that the sheets found in the Appellants premises were made out of non-duty paid coils.  The weight of the coils on which duty is paid tallies with the weight of the sheets on which credit was taken.  It shows that....