<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 195 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48211</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the CESTAT&#039;s findings regarding the burden of proof in cases of non-compliance with Modvat credit procedures and the application of the broad co-relation principle for determining eligibility for such benefits. The Court emphasized the importance of establishing a clear connection between duty-paid inputs and credited outputs to support claims for Modvat benefits. As the Department failed to prove that the sheets in the appellant&#039;s premises were made from non-duty paid coils, the appeal was dismissed based on the factual and legal conclusions drawn by the CESTAT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:03:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 195 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48211</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the CESTAT&#039;s findings regarding the burden of proof in cases of non-compliance with Modvat credit procedures and the application of the broad co-relation principle for determining eligibility for such benefits. The Court emphasized the importance of establishing a clear connection between duty-paid inputs and credited outputs to support claims for Modvat benefits. As the Department failed to prove that the sheets in the appellant&#039;s premises were made from non-duty paid coils, the appeal was dismissed based on the factual and legal conclusions drawn by the CESTAT.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>