Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the disallowance of property tax under section 43B required fresh adjudication in view of the assessee's contention that the claim was not examined on merits; (ii) Whether interest earned from co-operative banks was eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d).
Issue (i): Whether the disallowance of property tax under section 43B required fresh adjudication in view of the assessee's contention that the claim was not examined on merits.
Analysis: The assessee contended that it was a co-operative housing society operating on mutuality principles and that the disputed property tax item had not been properly examined by the first appellate authority. The record showed that the specific factual and legal assertions were not adjudicated in a speaking manner. In such circumstances, a reasoned decision on the disallowance could not be sustained without examining those submissions.
Conclusion: The issue was remanded to the first appellate authority for fresh adjudication on merits after granting opportunity of hearing.
Issue (ii): Whether interest earned from co-operative banks was eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d).
Analysis: The assessee claimed deduction on interest received from co-operative banks. The Tribunal noted that coordinate benches had consistently held that interest derived by a co-operative society from investments with a co-operative bank falls within the scope of section 80P(2)(d), and that the bar relating to co-operative banks does not defeat the deduction claimed by the recipient co-operative society. Following that view, the disallowance could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The deduction under section 80P(2)(d) was allowed in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: One issue was restored for reconsideration and the other was decided in favour of the assessee, resulting in partial allowance of the appeals.
Ratio Decidendi: A co-operative society is entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(d) on interest earned from investments with a co-operative bank, and where the first appellate authority fails to adjudicate a specific contention on merits, the matter may be remanded for fresh consideration.