Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner was justified in rejecting the petitioner's request to pay interest demanded on belated payment of admitted self-assessed tax in instalments under Section 80 read with Rule 158 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax regime.
Analysis: The demand arose from delayed deposit of tax disclosed in self-assessed returns. Interest under Section 50 is a statutory and compensatory consequence of failure to pay tax within the prescribed time and accrues automatically on the unpaid amount. Section 80 empowers the Commissioner to allow instalments only in respect of amounts due under the Act other than amounts due as per liability self-assessed in a return. Since the liability in question was interest arising from belated payment of self-assessed tax, the claim fell within the exclusion built into Section 80. The statutory text left no scope to extend instalment relief to such liability.
Conclusion: The rejection of instalment relief was valid and the challenge to the demand failed.
Final Conclusion: Relief under the instalment mechanism was unavailable for the impugned liability, and the writ petition failed on merits.
Ratio Decidendi: Instalment payment under Section 80 is unavailable for amounts attributable to self-assessed liability in returns, and interest for belated payment of admitted tax is an automatic statutory consequence under Section 50.