Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether medicinal preparations are exigible to duty under Item 1 of the Schedule to the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 when alcohol is present in them through a component such as tincture and not added directly in free form.
Analysis: Section 3(1) levies excise duty on dutiable goods at the rates specified in the Schedule, and Item 1 covers medicinal preparations being patent or proprietary medicines containing alcohol and not capable of being consumed as ordinary alcoholic beverages. On the admitted facts, the preparations were medicinal, proprietary, non-beverage preparations and contained alcohol because tincture, one of their ingredients, itself contained alcohol. The statutory language requires only that the preparation contain alcohol; it does not require direct addition of pure alcohol. The rebate provision in Section 4 was also treated as supporting the legislative contemplation of duty on such preparations.
Conclusion: The preparations were held dutiable notwithstanding that alcohol reached them indirectly through another ingredient, and the appellant's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A medicinal preparation attracts duty under Item 1 if it contains alcohol in any form, including through an alcoholic ingredient, and direct addition of pure alcohol is not required by the statute.