Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an appeal under section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 lies against an order refusing to condone delay in filing an application under section 34 to set aside an arbitral award.
Analysis: Section 34(1) makes recourse to court available only by an application for setting aside the award in accordance with sub-sections (2) and (3), and sub-section (3) imposes a strict limitation period with a further outer period of thirty days. Section 37(1)(c) permits an appeal from an order setting aside or refusing to set aside an arbitral award under section 34, and the expression "under section 34" extends to the entirety of section 34, not merely to the merits grounds in sub-section (2). The refusal to condone delay therefore has the legal effect of refusing to set aside the award and falls within the appealable class of orders. The reasoning in the earlier precedent under the pari materia provision of the Arbitration Act, 1940 was accepted, and contrary High Court views were overruled. The judgment in the condonation-granted context did not govern the present question.
Conclusion: The appeal under section 37(1)(c) was held to be maintainable against the order refusing to condone delay in filing the section 34 application.
Ratio Decidendi: An order refusing to condone delay in a section 34 application, because it finally results in refusal to set aside the award, is appealable under section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.