https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404018 An order refusing to condone delay in filing a section 34 application is treated as an order refusing to set aside the arbitral award, because section 34 permits recourse only through an application made within the prescribed limitation period and section 37(1)(c) appeals from orders setting aside or refusing to set aside an award under section 34. The phrase "under section 34" covers the whole of section 34, not merely the substantive grounds in sub-section (2). Accordingly, the refusal to condone delay falls within the appealable category, and the appeal under section 37(1)(c) is maintainable. Contrary High Court views were overruled, while the condonation-granted precedent was held inapplicable. en-us Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Aug 2021 10:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404018 An order refusing to condone delay in filing a section 34 application is treated as an order refusing to set aside the arbitral award, because section 34 permits recourse only through an application made within the prescribed limitation period and section 37(1)(c) appeals from orders setting aside or refusing to set aside an award under section 34. The phrase "under section 34" covers the whole of section 34, not merely the substantive grounds in sub-section (2). Accordingly, the refusal to condone delay falls within the appealable category, and the appeal under section 37(1)(c) is maintainable. Contrary High Court views were overruled, while the condonation-granted precedent was held inapplicable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404018