TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate Tribunal remands case for fair EGM conduct & appointment of Independent Administrator</h1> <h3>Achala Gold Agritech Investments Limited, Mr. Om Prakash Avulla Versus M/s Achala Gold Agritech Investment Limited & Others And U.V. Hari Prasada Raju & Ors. Versus Achala Gold Agritech Investment Ltd. & Ors.</h3> Achala Gold Agritech Investments Limited, Mr. Om Prakash Avulla Versus M/s Achala Gold Agritech Investment Limited & Others And U.V. Hari Prasada Raju & ... Issues:1. Validity of resolution passed in board meetings and general meetings.2. Allegations of oppression and mismanagement.3. Compliance with Companies Act, 2013 regarding appointment of directors and share transfers.4. Notice requirements for meetings and shareholder approvals.5. Dispute over property ownership and sale.Issue 1: Validity of resolution passed in meetingsThe appeals were filed against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) challenging the validity of resolutions passed in board meetings and general meetings. The Appellants alleged that the Respondents took actions to increase their control over the company without informing the Appellants. The NCLT approved the resolutions, leading to the appeals.Issue 2: Allegations of oppression and mismanagementThe Appellants accused the Respondents of oppression and mismanagement, seeking to declare the meetings invalid and restrain the Respondents from certain actions. The NCLT, however, approved the resolutions, prompting the Appellants to appeal the decision.Issue 3: Compliance with Companies Act, 2013The Appellants argued that the Respondents violated the Companies Act, 2013 by appointing directors without proper notice and forging meeting minutes. They also alleged unauthorized filings with the Registrar of Companies and property usurpation. The Respondents defended their actions, stating compliance with the Act and the company's Articles of Association.Issue 4: Notice requirements and shareholder approvalsDisputes arose over notice serving for meetings and shareholder attendance. The Respondents claimed proper notice serving and shareholder consent for asset sales, while the Appellants contested the validity of these procedures.Issue 5: Dispute over property ownership and saleThe Respondents invested in the company and purchased properties, leading to disagreements over property ownership and sales. The NCLT directed the convening of an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) with specific procedures to address the property sale issue, removing the requirement for the Appellants to be joint signatories.In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal remanded the matter back to the NCLT, Hyderabad, for further proceedings, emphasizing the proper conduct of the EGM and the appointment of an Independent Administrator for fair decision-making.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
