<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 647 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397704</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal remanded the case back to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Hyderabad, for further proceedings. It emphasized the proper conduct of the Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) and the appointment of an Independent Administrator to ensure fair decision-making regarding the disputes over property ownership, resolution validity, compliance with the Companies Act, notice requirements, and shareholder approvals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 10:36:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 647 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397704</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal remanded the case back to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Hyderabad, for further proceedings. It emphasized the proper conduct of the Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) and the appointment of an Independent Administrator to ensure fair decision-making regarding the disputes over property ownership, resolution validity, compliance with the Companies Act, notice requirements, and shareholder approvals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>