Tribunal corrects counsel names in Final Order, recognizing appearance by Chartered Accountants, not Advocate. The tribunal rectified a mistake in recording the names of the arguing counsels in the Final Order, acknowledging that the correct appearance for the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal corrects counsel names in Final Order, recognizing appearance by Chartered Accountants, not Advocate.
The tribunal rectified a mistake in recording the names of the arguing counsels in the Final Order, acknowledging that the correct appearance for the assessee was by Chartered Accountants Mr. V.S. Sudhir and Mr. P. Venkat Prasad, not Advocate Mr. Jitender Motwani as originally stated due to a typographical error.
The judgment pertains to rectification of a mistake in recording the name of arguing counsels in Final Order No.A/31277/2018. The correct appearance for the assessee was by Mr. V.S. Sudhir and Mr. P. Venkat Prasad, Chartered Accountants, not Mr. Jitender Motwani, Advocate as mentioned due to a typographical error. The application for rectification of mistake was disposed of by the tribunal.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.