<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 479 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378035</link>
    <description>The tribunal rectified a mistake in recording the names of the arguing counsels in the Final Order, acknowledging that the correct appearance for the assessee was by Chartered Accountants Mr. V.S. Sudhir and Mr. P. Venkat Prasad, not Advocate Mr. Jitender Motwani as originally stated due to a typographical error.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 09:29:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 479 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378035</link>
      <description>The tribunal rectified a mistake in recording the names of the arguing counsels in the Final Order, acknowledging that the correct appearance for the assessee was by Chartered Accountants Mr. V.S. Sudhir and Mr. P. Venkat Prasad, not Advocate Mr. Jitender Motwani as originally stated due to a typographical error.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>