Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent authorities could encash the bank guarantee pending disposal of the petitioner's statutory appeal, and whether the earlier judgment required recall.
Analysis: The petitioner informed the Court that the goods had already been released on furnishing a bank guarantee and that a statutory appeal had since been filed. The State also stated that the guarantee would be kept intact until the appeal was decided. In these circumstances, the earlier judgment was recalled and protection was granted against encashment during the pendency of the appeal.
Conclusion: The respondent authorities were directed not to encash the bank guarantee until the petitioner's statutory appeal is considered on merits.