<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1518 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369552</link>
    <description>A bank guarantee furnished for release of goods was protected from encashment while the petitioner&#039;s statutory appeal remained pending, with the State indicating that the guarantee would be kept intact until the appeal was decided. On those facts, the earlier judgment was recalled and interim protection was granted, directing the authorities not to encash the guarantee until the appeal was considered on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1518 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369552</link>
      <description>A bank guarantee furnished for release of goods was protected from encashment while the petitioner&#039;s statutory appeal remained pending, with the State indicating that the guarantee would be kept intact until the appeal was decided. On those facts, the earlier judgment was recalled and interim protection was granted, directing the authorities not to encash the guarantee until the appeal was considered on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>