TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Writ petition on CGST Act disposed in favor of petitioner citing precedent, ensuring legal consistency</h1> <h3>ALLEPPEY PARCEL SERVICE Versus THE ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO. III, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM, COMMISSIONER OF KERALA STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF KERALA STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO TAXES, TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM</h3> ALLEPPEY PARCEL SERVICE Versus THE ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO. III, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM, COMMISSIONER OF KERALA STATE GOODS AND ... Issues:Petitioner seeks relief through a writ petition against the 1st respondent, challenging the proceedings and penalties imposed under the CGST Act.Analysis:The petitioner sought various reliefs through the writ petition, including a mandamus to drop the proceedings, a declaration that non-filling up of Part-B does not fall under Section 129(1)(a), limiting the penalty to Section 126(1) or Section 122(iv) of the CGST Act, refund of excess penalty via Bank Guarantee, and quashing of Exhibit P6 notice by a writ of certiorari. Both counsels agreed that the issues were covered in the petitioner's favor by a previous judgment of the Court in W.P.(C) No.13980 of 2018, with a modified order dated 05th September 2018 in RP No. 703 of 2018. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of, applying the ratio of the referenced judgment.This judgment highlights the importance of legal precedents and how they can impact the outcome of a case. By referencing a previous judgment where similar issues were addressed in favor of the petitioner, the Court was able to resolve the current matter efficiently. The petitioner's claims were considered in light of existing legal interpretations, ensuring consistency in the application of the law. The decision to dispose of the writ petition based on the ratio of the earlier judgment demonstrates the significance of established legal principles in guiding judicial decisions.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
