Denovo adjudication compliance: substantial conformity with remand directions left no basis for further clarification.

A denovo adjudication following remand was examined for compliance with the Tribunal's directions. The record showed that the adjudicating authority had substantially followed the earlier remand, confining confirmation of demand, interest and penalties to the scope indicated in the show cause notice and the prior order. As no inconsistency or operative ambiguity was found in the denovo order, no further clarification was warranted. The clarification request was therefore rejected, and the denovo adjudication remained undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: Whether any clarification was required in respect of the denovo adjudication carried out pursuant to the Tribunal's remand directions.

Analysis: The records and the chart placed before the Tribunal showed that the adjudicating authority had substantially followed the earlier remand directions and had confined the confirmation of demands, interest and penalties to the extent indicated in the show cause notice and the Tribunal's earlier order. The Tribunal found no inconsistency or ambiguity in the denovo order warranting further clarification.

Conclusion: No clarification was called for in the denovo adjudication, and the request for clarification was rejected.

Final Conclusion: The denovo adjudication was left undisturbed and the matter stood disposed of without any further clarification or interference.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a denovo order substantially complies with remand directions and shows no operative ambiguity, no further clarification is warranted.

---