2018 (6) TMI 182
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... None for the Respondent. ORDER Per: M.V. Ravindran When this matter was called out, none appeared on behalf of the respondent, despite notice. Since the matter is of 2009, we take up the appeal for disposal even in the absence of any representation from Respondent. 2. Heard Ld. DR(s) and perused the records. 3. On perusal of the records, it transpires that the adjudicating auth....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ing that rest of the order portion of Order-in-Original dt. 08.01.2007 and 09.01.2007 is retained. It is her submission that necessary clarification may be issued. 5. After hearing Ld. Commissioner(A.R.) on 03.05.2018, we had directed her to produce a chart indicating the demands raised in the show cause notice confirmed by the earlier Order-in-Original and the impugned order in original based ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e) Not confirmed Penalty confirmed on duty demand on indigenous capital goods etc., Rs.50.00 lakhs OIO (Denovo) Confirmed Rs.17026444/- only as per SCN. Interest confirmed Penalty on above as proposed in SCN. Not interfered as it is in Sl.No. 1 23 4 Rule 173Q penalty 5 Sec 112 penalty Customs Rs.50.00 lakhs Act 6 7 Confiscate ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.....Agarwal, MD 12 Rule 209 A penalty on Rs.2.00 lakhs Mr.P.V.Sastry, Central Excise In-charge 13 Rule 209 A penalty on Rs.10.00 lakhs M/s.New Sarika Cotton Traders 14 Rule 209 A penalty on Rs.10.00 lakhs Mr.K.V.Prasad, MD of New Sarika Cotton Traders 15 Rule 209 A penalty on Rs.10.00 lakhs M/s. Jaya Lakshmi Spinning Mills 16 Rule 2....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI