https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361355 A denovo adjudication following remand was examined for compliance with the Tribunal's directions. The record showed that the adjudicating authority had substantially followed the earlier remand, confining confirmation of demand, interest and penalties to the scope indicated in the show cause notice and the prior order. As no inconsistency or operative ambiguity was found in the denovo order, no further clarification was warranted. The clarification request was therefore rejected, and the denovo adjudication remained undisturbed. en-us Tue, 08 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jun 2018 13:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361355 A denovo adjudication following remand was examined for compliance with the Tribunal's directions. The record showed that the adjudicating authority had substantially followed the earlier remand, confining confirmation of demand, interest and penalties to the scope indicated in the show cause notice and the prior order. As no inconsistency or operative ambiguity was found in the denovo order, no further clarification was warranted. The clarification request was therefore rejected, and the denovo adjudication remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 08 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361355