Reasoned appellate orders are essential; unexplained dismissal was set aside and the matter remanded for reconsideration.

A High Court order dismissing an appeal without reasons was treated as defective because the court was required to explain why no substantial question of law arose. The absence of such reasoning prevented meaningful review, so the order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the High Court for fresh consideration.

---

---

Issues: Whether the High Court's dismissal of the appeal without assigning reasons could be sustained, and whether the matter should be sent back for fresh consideration.

Analysis: The absence of reasons in the High Court's order was treated as a material defect because the court was expected to indicate why no substantial question of law arose. In view of that deficiency, the order was set aside and the matter was sent back to the High Court.

Outcome: The matter was remanded to the High Court for fresh consideration.

---