<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 818 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334800</link>
    <description>A High Court order dismissing an appeal without reasons was treated as defective because the court was required to explain why no substantial question of law arose. The absence of such reasoning prevented meaningful review, so the order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the High Court for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 818 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334800</link>
      <description>A High Court order dismissing an appeal without reasons was treated as defective because the court was required to explain why no substantial question of law arose. The absence of such reasoning prevented meaningful review, so the order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the High Court for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>