TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Allahabad HC upholds Tribunal's Rule 8(3A) interpretation. Appeal dismissed.</h1> The Allahabad HC dismissed the appeal as no substantial question of law arose. The Tribunal's interpretation of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, ... Interpretation of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Held that: - we find that no substantial question of law arises for consideration. The Tribunal has correctly interpreted Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appeal dismissed. The Allahabad High Court dismissed the appeal as no substantial question of law arose for consideration. The Tribunal correctly interpreted Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
