Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was maintainable and admissible on proof of financial debt, default, and limitation.
Analysis: The application was supported by the loan sanction documents, loan agreement, acknowledgments, statements of account, default computation, and record of NPA. The objection that the loan had been advanced only to a trust was rejected because the documents showed that the corporate debtor had jointly executed the loan arrangement. The discrepancy in the date of default was treated as a typographical error, and the application was found to be within limitation. On the documentary record, the adjudicating authority was satisfied that a financial debt existed and that default had occurred.
Conclusion: The application under section 7 was held to be complete, within limitation, and liable to be admitted. CIRP was initiated and an Interim Resolution Professional was appointed.