Second revision barred after Sessions Judge revision is decided, making a further High Court challenge not maintainable.

Section 399(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 bars a further revision before the High Court by a person who has already invoked the Sessions Judge's revisional jurisdiction, because the Sessions Judge's decision is final for that person. Applying that rule, the High Court treated the challenge as an impermissible second revision after the Sessions Judge had already decided the first revision and found no infirmity in that order. The second revision was therefore held not maintainable and was dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether a second revision before the High Court was maintainable after the Sessions Judge had decided the first revision under Section 399(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Analysis: Section 399(3) bars a further revision at the instance of a person who has already invoked the revisional jurisdiction of the Sessions Judge, because the Sessions Judge's decision in relation to such person is final. The earlier revisional order had already been passed by the Sessions Judge, and the High Court found no infirmity in that order. In these circumstances, the departmental challenge amounted to a second revision, which the statute does not permit.

Conclusion: The second revision was not maintainable and was dismissed.

---