https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265427 Section 399(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 bars a further revision before the High Court by a person who has already invoked the Sessions Judge's revisional jurisdiction, because the Sessions Judge's decision is final for that person. Applying that rule, the High Court treated the challenge as an impermissible second revision after the Sessions Judge had already decided the first revision and found no infirmity in that order. The second revision was therefore held not maintainable and was dismissed. en-us Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Oct 2015 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265427 Section 399(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 bars a further revision before the High Court by a person who has already invoked the Sessions Judge's revisional jurisdiction, because the Sessions Judge's decision is final for that person. Applying that rule, the High Court treated the challenge as an impermissible second revision after the Sessions Judge had already decided the first revision and found no infirmity in that order. The second revision was therefore held not maintainable and was dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265427