2015 (10) TMI 702
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....oner : Mr. D.D. Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent : None JITENDRA CHAUHAN J. (Oral) 1. As per the office report, summons issued to the respondents received back unserved with the report that the Mill has been locked for the last ten years and that respondents No.2 and 3, are not residing at the given address and left without address. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... which are alleged to have been removed clandestinely on private bills/records and that order achieves finality, the revenue would be entitled to file fresh complaint against the accused on the same facts and ground in accordance with law and this judgment will not stand in their way to that extent." Against this order dated 24.04.1992, the department went in revision, in which following order ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Judge, Amritsar and could not possibly assail it on any ground, at this stage. 6. This Court has gone through the impugned judgment of the First Revisional Court and finds no infirmity in the same. This is the second revision filed by the Department in this Court, which is not maintainable. Section 399(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, reads as under:- 1. XXXX 2. XXXX 3. Where any....
TaxTMI