Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the duty demand on sodium hypochloride, cleared to the sister unit, was sustainable without considering the appellant's plea that the goods were manufactured on job work basis under Notification No. 214/86.
Analysis: The appellant contended that the goods were manufactured on job work basis and cleared under challans to the sister unit, but the relevant job work records had been seized by the department. The mere debit of duty at the time of detection and the recorded statements were held insufficient by themselves to conclude clandestine removal. Since the appellant was not given an effective opportunity to substantiate the plea through the seized records or the sister unit's parallel records, the matter required reconsideration with observance of natural justice.
Conclusion: The duty demand relating to sodium hypochloride was set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication in favour of the appellant.