<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 107 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216292</link>
    <description>Duty demand on sodium hypochloride cleared to a sister unit was set aside because the appellant&#039;s plea that the goods were manufactured on job work basis under Notification No. 214/86 had not been properly considered. The tribunal found that debit of duty at detection and recorded statements were not, by themselves, sufficient to establish clandestine removal. As the relevant job work records had been seized and the appellant was not given an effective opportunity to rely on those records or the sister unit&#039;s parallel records, the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication with observance of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 16:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 107 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216292</link>
      <description>Duty demand on sodium hypochloride cleared to a sister unit was set aside because the appellant&#039;s plea that the goods were manufactured on job work basis under Notification No. 214/86 had not been properly considered. The tribunal found that debit of duty at detection and recorded statements were not, by themselves, sufficient to establish clandestine removal. As the relevant job work records had been seized and the appellant was not given an effective opportunity to rely on those records or the sister unit&#039;s parallel records, the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication with observance of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>