Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (9) TMI 107

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... as also of inputs was detected by the officers. On the above basis proceedings were initiated against them by way of issuance of a show cause notice, which culminated into an order passed by the original adjudicating authority and subsequently confirmed by Commissioner (Appeals) vide his impugned order. 2. Learned advocate appearing for the appellant submits that the duty confirmation in respect of the final product and various inputs is as under :   Sr. No. Description of goods Quantity Value (in Rs.) Amount of Duty (in Rs.) Allegation 1. Sodium Hypochloride 183295 Kgs. 916475=00 146636=00 Removal of goods without payment of duty 2. Sodium Sulphate 1000 kgs. 7000=00 1120=0....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....missioner (Appeals) by observing as under : "On the final products, namely, Sodium Hypochloride involving duty of Rs. 146636 and (ii) Sodium Sulphate involving duty of 1120, the lower authority has confirmed the demands on his findings that the appellants had cleared to the consignee, M/s. Heranba Industries, said final products without payment of duty. The appellant's contention is that these goods were processed on job work and therefore no duty is payable. It is observed that the appellant unit had not made any such plea at the time of detection of the case by the department. In fact, the appellant unit had admitted before the panchas at the time of booking the case on 9-2-2000. Secondly, the appellants paid the duty involved in these....