Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2012 (9) TMI 107

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fficers. On the above basis proceedings were initiated against them by way of issuance of a show cause notice, which culminated into an order passed by the original adjudicating authority and subsequently confirmed by Commissioner (Appeals) vide his impugned order. 2. Learned advocate appearing for the appellant submits that the duty confirmation in respect of the final product and various inputs is as under :   Sr. No. Description of goods Quantity Value (in Rs.) Amount of Duty (in Rs.) Allegation 1. Sodium Hypochloride 183295 Kgs. 916475=00 146636=00 Removal of goods without payment of duty 2. Sodium Sulphate 1000 kgs. 7000=00 1120=00 Removal of goods without payment of duty 3. Cypermethrine 582 kgs. 2704....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Sulphate involving duty of 1120, the lower authority has confirmed the demands on his findings that the appellants had cleared to the consignee, M/s. Heranba Industries, said final products without payment of duty. The appellant's contention is that these goods were processed on job work and therefore no duty is payable. It is observed that the appellant unit had not made any such plea at the time of detection of the case by the department. In fact, the appellant unit had admitted before the panchas at the time of booking the case on 9-2-2000. Secondly, the appellants paid the duty involved in these goods vide their debit entry No. 09 dated 9-2-2000. If the theory of job work propounded by the appellants is true, then there was no need for ....