Tribunal rules in favor of bank in tax dispute over interest payments

The Tribunal held that the jurisdiction of the CIT(A), Noida was proper for the appeal concerning the deletion of demand under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It was determined that the payment of interest by banks to NOIDA did not require tax withholding. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee bank, ruling that it could not be considered in default under the Income-tax Act. As a result, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed on 07.08.2015.

---

---

Issues: Jurisdiction of CIT(A) and Deletion of demand under Income-tax Act, 1961

Jurisdiction of CIT(A):
The appeal by the Revenue raised two issues - the jurisdiction of the CIT(A), Noida to pass the order and the deletion of demand created by the Addl.CIT(TDS) Ghaziabad under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal proceeded ex parte as there was no appearance from the side of the assessee. Simultaneously with this appeal, another appeal was heard, establishing that the jurisdiction to pass orders against the Addl.CIT(TDS), Ghaziabad rested with the CIT(A), Ghaziabad for a specific period. For the relevant period, it was held that only the CIT(A), Noida had the rightful jurisdiction over the appeal. The Tribunal concluded that the payment of interest by banks to NOIDA did not require tax withholding under section 194A(3)(iii)(f), setting aside the order passed by the Addl.CIT(TDS) under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) read with section 194A.

Deletion of Demand:
The Tribunal, after considering the facts and circumstances of the case, found them similar to another appeal. Following the decision in that appeal, the Tribunal decided both issues against the Revenue. It was directed that the assessee bank could not be treated as an assessee in default under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order was pronounced in open court on 07.08.2015.

---