<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1375 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191412</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the jurisdiction of the CIT(A), Noida was proper for the appeal concerning the deletion of demand under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It was determined that the payment of interest by banks to NOIDA did not require tax withholding. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee bank, ruling that it could not be considered in default under the Income-tax Act. As a result, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed on 07.08.2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 07:34:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1375 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191412</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the jurisdiction of the CIT(A), Noida was proper for the appeal concerning the deletion of demand under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It was determined that the payment of interest by banks to NOIDA did not require tax withholding. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee bank, ruling that it could not be considered in default under the Income-tax Act. As a result, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed on 07.08.2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>