TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the accused were guilty of the offence of attempt to murder under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; (ii) whether the accused were entitled to probation of good conduct under Section 360 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; and (iii) whether the compensation awarded to the injured victim was legally sustainable and, if so, what amount was .
Issue (i): Whether the accused were guilty of the offence of attempt to murder under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Analysis: Liability under Section 307 depends on the intention or knowledge with which the act was done, and not merely on the result. The nature of the weapon, the manner of use, the part of the body targeted, the motive, and the surrounding circumstances are relevant in inferring such intention. On the facts, the occurrence arose out of a sudden flare-up during a fight between the parties. The accused did not use the sharp edge of the weapons and the injuries, though serious in some cases, did not establish a clear intention to commit murder.
Conclusion: The acquittal of the accused under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was upheld.
Issue (ii): Whether the accused were entitled to probation of good conduct under Section 360 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Analysis: Probation is intended for offenders who are not dangerous criminals and where the circumstances justify a reformative approach. The absence of prior enmity, the sudden nature of the occurrence, and the lack of an intention to commit murder supported extension of the benefit of probation. The order releasing the accused on probation was therefore consistent with the beneficial object of the provision.
Conclusion: The grant of probation of good conduct was upheld.
Issue (iii): Whether the compensation awarded to the injured victim was legally sustainable and, if so, what amount was .
Analysis: Section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 empowers a court to award compensation to a victim even where fine does not form part of the sentence. The provision is intended to recognise the victim's loss and to ensure that the criminal process responds meaningfully to the injury suffered. Compensation must be reasonable, having regard to the nature of the injury, the claim of the victim, and the ability of the accused to pay. On the facts, the victim had suffered permanent disability and the earlier amount was found inadequate.
Conclusion: The compensation was enhanced to a substantially higher amount and the award was sustained under Section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Final Conclusion: The acquittal under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and the order of probation were maintained, but the compensation payable to the injured victim was increased to meet the ends of justice.
Ratio Decidendi: In determining attempt to murder, intention must be inferred from the totality of circumstances and not merely from the injury caused, and compensation under Section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 should be awarded liberally but must remain reasonable and commensurate with the injury and the offender's capacity to pay.
TaxTMI 
